SWHAP! This is the development-sector-friendly acronym for my work this summer. (Thanks Payton!)
Safe Water HAndling Practices. This is my main project while I’m here at the District Water Office in Mzimba, Malawi. I will now do my best to try explain it, taking the long way there, and beginning with the background.
In the past, aid has often been about numbers. In fact, a lot of it still is. It’s easy to say things like ”Last month we donated 200 cases of chlorine tablets.” Or “This program will see 11 houses constructed.”
Too often, I think, “helping” has been equated with giving things. And doesn’t that feel great? You’ve given someone in need something for free! But did they really need it? Is this addressing the problem or is it treating the symptoms of that problem?
How much of this ‘giving’ is actually forcing? Picture an organization driving out to a remote village in Malawi and donating chlorine for water treatment. If the community gets a quick explanation of what it is, how to use it, and why it’s good, is that enough to encourage a change? In my experience here, no. It certainly isn’t. In the three villages in which we have so far tried the SWHAP program, two had previously received chlorine handouts from the government and both had thrown the chlorine away. This is just one of many, many examples I’ve seen here.
Handouts don’t work.
This is why the district government is so excited about this new program I’m helping develop with them.
The idea behind the project is that communities can lead their own change. They are capable of change without handouts. Moreover, the changes made by communities are sustainable, if they come from within the community—they will have ownership over it—instead of being forced on them from the outside.
This is so important. Maybe you want to read that again!
There are programs being implemented in this spirit around the country. This simple understanding, that poor people are people, seems so simple—People power! But there are still too many projects, which aren’t using these principles. (If you are curious, I have some of my own thoughts on why they still exist, but I have to keep this post moving!)
After first arriving in Malawi, I was involved in the CLTS program in this district. It’s exactly this. A facilitation process in communities whereby communities are triggered to change their own behaviours. No subsidies, no handouts. The results are incredible! Yesterday I followed up in one of the villages and it’s astonishing, the work the community has done itself. Imagine families digging 12+ foot deep holes by hand and constructing shelters with locally available materials. When people are truly motivated themselves, they have the power. The results are incredible.
Finally to SWHAP. Hopefully, I haven’t been too confusing.
SWHAP (Safe Water HAndling Practices) considers all of this.
Field staff from the government’s health department and water department come into a village to learn. They ask questions of the community, and use “tools” to ignite a behavior change within people.
The community will take the facilitators to their drinking water source, which might be a stream, well, or borehole. The facilitators will then use these “tools”, which are simply demonstrations that encourage discussion and controversy among the community. Practically, a tool can be as simple as taking a cup of water from the drinking pail, drinking some of it, and returning the rest of the water to the pail. Enough to encourage debate among the community and start conversations about safe practices around drinking water.
SWHAP targets transportation of water to the home, treatment of the water, storage, and consumption behaviours.
The facilitation process hinges on good facilitators. It’s a people-centred process, and very personal. There is no set procedure, rather the tools are adapted to any situation.
The result is, community members collectively create an action plan to—get this—plan what actions they will take.
The government field workers then monitor the villages and help in whatever ways they can until the community has completed their own
behaviour change.

The first ever SWHAP facilitation. Facilitators interact with a community at a stream, their drinking water source.
It doesn’t take handouts and it doesn’t take millions of dollars. All it takes is good planning, adaptive facilitation, and timely follow ups.
People power.
It’s Friday today and this week we’ve just finished testing the process and the tools in three villages. We’ll continue to unpack all the learnings we can from those trials to improve the process, before trying a second iteration.
Today, very motivated and expressive individuals we identified from each village as natural leaders were brought together to share their villages’ action plans. It was incredible the detail and extent to which the communities had planned. All three villages have committed to being “safe” within 5 days! The facilitators were thrilled with the progress and can’t wait to follow up with the villages on their planned dates.
That’s a (quick?) look at SWHAP! Please send any questions/arguments
you have my way and I’ll do my best to answer!
Peace,
Keith